University of Nevada, Reno

Department of Mechanical Engineering

MECH 452

Spring 1997

Proposal Evaluation Criteria


Submit three copies of each proposal. Proposals are limited to a maximum of fifteen 8.5" x 11" pages (minimum type size is 10 pt., double spaced, 1" margins), stapled at the upper-left-hand corner of the package (no fancy covers). This includes all elements of the proposal (text, graphics, exhibits, appendices). Each proposal should also contain:

  1. Cover Sheet. Course number and name; title of project; team name; team member names, titles, phone numbers, and email addresses; date.
  2. Project Summary. This is a brief, concise statement (200 words max.) of the project objectives and work plan.

The proposal is worth 1000 points and will be graded based on the following sections/criteria:

Format: 100 pts
The proposal should be neat, well organized and easy to read.

Technical Background and Significance of the Problem or Opportunity:
Make a clear statement of the significance of the specific technical problem or opportunity addressed. This section also should provide a thorough discussion of the technical background of the stated problem or opportunity. It is in this discussion that management determines the extent of the proposer's knowledge in this area.

Objectives: 100 pts
Briefly outline (a) the specific objectives of project, (b) technical approach the to be used in solving the problem or developing the product and (c) the anticipated results of the project.

Research or Product/Process Development Plan: 100 pts
This is the principal part of the proposal. The research plan should include in narrative form a (1) technical discussion of the problem or opportunity and (2) discussion of how this research or R&D will achieve major benefits in terms of significant research results, improved products or processes or in solving important technical problems which could substantially reduce costs or improve performance. Where possible, the methods and task to be performed should be outlined in logical sequence and explained in detail. Do not assume the reviewer will fill in the gaps in your logic.

Be candid and state where problems exist and additional work may be needed to prove your idea or innovative approach. Small incremental improvements are not the objective of the MECH 452 program. High-risk innovations are. Factual rather than promotional information is requested.

Related Research or Product Development: 100 pts
Describe significant, recently completed or current research, product development or success that (a) you have achieved in the field and (b) others have achieved that is directly related to the proposed effort. Describe how this relates to the proposed effort and why your effort is different. You must demonstrate a knowledge of state-of-the-art R&D in your project area. The proposer should include a current bibliography of directly relevant technical literature that has been reviewed.

Key Personnel: 100 pts
Identify key personnel and describe directly related education and experience.

Facilities: 100 pts
Describe the relevant instrumentation and facilities available or required to complete the research or product development.

Budget: 100 pts
Include a budget that estimates the R&D costs and provides some market projections for expected revenues from the product development effort.

Oral Presentation: 200 pts
Should be no more than 10 minutes, well organized and use